Then Ventoy will load without issue if the secure boot is enabled in the BIOS. en_windows_10_business_editions_version_2004_updated_may_2020_x64_dvd_aa8db2cc.iso ", same error during creating windows 7 I would also like to point out that I reported the issue as a general remark to help with Ventoy development, after looking at the manner in which Ventoy was addressing the Secure Boot problem (and finding an issue there), rather than as an actual Ventoy user. I have absolutely no problem with letting the user choose if they want to run a bootloader that failed Secure Boot validation, and I think this might be the better way to do it indeed. Tried with archlinux-2021.05.01-x86_64 which is listed as compatible and it is working flawlessly. all give ERROR on my PC That is to say, a WinPE.iso or ubuntu.iso file can be booted fine with secure boot enabled(even no need for the user to whitelist them) but it may contain a malicious application in it. If I wasn't aware that Ventoy uses SUISBD, I would be confused just as you by its Secure Boot "support" and lack of information about its consequences. Expect working results in 3 months maximum. https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s. So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. And of course, people expect that if they run UEFIinSecureBoot or similar software, whose goal is explicitly stated as such, it will effectively remove Secure Boot. It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. Ventoy's boot menu is not shown but with the following grub shell. Its ok. So any method that allows users to boot their media without having to explicitly disable Secure Boot can be seen as a nice thing to have even if it comes at the price of reducing the overall security of one's computer. The user has Ubuntu, Fedora and OpenSUSE ISOs which they want to load. It typically has the same name, but you can rename it to something else should you choose to do so. For example, Ventoy can be modified to somehow chainload full chain of distros shim grub kernel, or custom validation functions could be made, which would, for example, validate and accept files signed with certificates in DB + a set of custom certificates (like ones embedded in distros' Shims), or even validate and automatically extract Shims embedded certificates and override EFI validation functions (as it's done currently to completely disable validation), but is this kind of complexity worth it for a USB boot utility which is implemented to be simple and convenient? But that not means they trust all the distros booted by Ventoy. Select "Partition scheme" as MBR (Master Boot Record) and "File system" as NTFS. openSUSE-Tumbleweed-XFCE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200402-Media - 925 MB, star-kirk-2.1.0-xfce-amd64-live.iso - 518 MB, Porteus-CINNAMON-v5.0rc1-x86_64.iso - 300 MB Reply. The main annoyance in my view is that it requires 2 points of contact for security updates (per https://github.com/rhboot/shim-review) and that I have some doubts that Microsoft will allow anything but a formal organization with more than a couple of people to become a SHIM provider. I've hacked-up PreLoader once again and managed to cleanly chainload Ubuntu ISO with Secure Boot enabled. using the direct ISO download method on MS website. Rufus or WoeUSB, in several meaningful ways.The program does not extract ISO images or other image formats to the USB drive but . Last time I tried that usb flash was nearly full, maybe thats why I couldnt do it. Yes. The point is that if a user whitelists Ventoy using MokManager, they are responsible for anything that they then subsequently run using Ventoy. The best workaround is to install some Linux variant (I use Fedora but Ubuntu and SUSE are supported) and install VirtualBox. It does not contain efi boot files. I'm aware that Super GRUB2 Disk's author tried to handle that, I'll ask him for comments. By the way, this issue could be closed, couldn't it? I'm considering two ways for user to select option 1. The MX21_February_x64.iso seems OK in VirtualBox for me. You can put a file with name .ventoyignore in the specific directory. P.S. It . Ubuntu has shim which load only Ubuntu, etc. If you really want to mount it, you can use the experimental option VTOY_LINUX_REMOUNT in Global Control Plugin. The injection is just like that I extract the ubuntu.iso and change/add some script and create an new ISO file. Hi, thanks for your repley boot i have same error after menu to start hdclone he's go back to the menu with a black windows saying he's loading the iso file to mem and that it freez. and leave it up to the user. So, yeah, it's the same as a safe manufacturer, on seeing that you have a room with extra security (e.g. if it's possible please add UEFI support for this great distro. Customizing installed software before installing LM. The only thing that changed is that the " No bootfile found for UEFI!" to your account, Hello Not exactly. After boot into the Ventoy main menu, pay attention to the lower left corner of the screen: 1.0.80 actually prompts you every time, so that's how I found it. @ValdikSS, I'm afraid I am fairly busy right now and, technically for me, investing time on this can be seen as going towards helping a "competing" product (since I am the creator of Rufus, though I genuinely don't have a problem with healthy competition and I'm quite happy to direct folks, who've been asking to produce a version of Rufus with multiboot for years, to use Ventoy instead), whereas I could certainly use that time to improve my own software . What you want is for users to be alerted if someone picked a Linux or Microsoft media, and the UEFI bootloader was altered from the original. How to suppress iso files under specific directory . I think it's OK. To add Ventoy to Easy2Boot v2, download the latest version of Ventoy Windows .ZIP file and drag-and-drop the Ventoy zip file onto the \e2b\Update agFM\Add_Ventoy.cmd file on the 2nd agFM partition. When user check the Secure boot support option then only run .efi file with valid signature is select. @ventoy I have tested on laptop Lenovo Ideapad Z570 and Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso gived same error but with additional information: netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso worked fine. Secure Boot is tricky to deal with and can (rightfully) be seen as a major inconvenience instead of yet another usually desireable line of defence against malware (but by all means not a panacea). Topics in this forum are automatically closed 6 months after creation. So from ventoy 1.0.09, an option for secure boot is added in Ventoy2Disk.exe/Ventoy2Disk.sh and default is disabled. The BIOS decides to boot Ventoy in Legacy BIOS mode or in UEFI mode. It implements the following features: This preloader allows to use Ventoy with proper Secure Boot verification. This iso seems to have some problem with UEFI. In Ventoy I had enabled Secure Boot and GPT. For instance, if you download a Windows or Linux ISO, you sure want to find out if someone altered the official bootloader, that was put there by the people who created the ISO, because it might tell you if something was maliciously inserted there. Do I need a custom shim protocol? Thanks! This could be useful for data recovery, OS re-installation, or just for booting from USB without thinking about additional steps. That is just to make sure it has really written the whole Ventoy install onto the usb stick. Once here, scroll down and move to the "Download Windows 11 Disk Image (ISO) for x64 devices" section. slitaz-next-180716.iso, Symantec.Ghost.Boot.CD.12.0.0.10658.x64.iso, regular-xfce-latest-x86_64.iso - 1.22 GB cambiar contrasea router nucom; personajes que lucharon por la igualdad de gnero; playa de arena rosa en bahamas; I don't remember if the shortcut is ctrl i or ctrl r for grub mode. Some Legacy BIOS has an access limitation and wont read a disk that exceeds the limitation. Any way to disable UEFI booting capability from Ventoy and only leave legacy? VentoyU allows users to update and install ISO files on the USB drive. In Linux, you need to specify the device to install Ventoy which can be a USB drive or local disk. No bootfile found for UEFI! sol-11_3-live-x86.iso | 1.22 GB, gnewsense-live-4.0-amd64-gnome.iso | 1.10 GB, hyperbola-milky-way-v0.3.1-dual.iso | 680 MB, kibojoe-17.09final-stable-x86_64-code21217.iso | 950 MB, uruk-gnu-linux-3.0-2020-6-alpha-1.iso | 1.35 GB, Redcore.Linux.Hardened.2004.KDE.amd64.iso | 3.5 GB, Drauger_OS-7.5.1-beta2-AMD64.iso | 1.8 GB, MagpieOS-Gnome-2.4-Eva-2018.10.01-x86_64.iso | 2.3 GB, kaisenlinuxrolling1.0-amd64.iso | 2.80 GB, chakra-2019.09.26-a022cb57-x86_64.iso | 2.7 GB, Regata_OS_19.1_en-US.x86_64-19.1.50.iso | 2.4 GB. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: I believe GRUB (at least v2.04 and previous versions if patched with Fedora patches) already work exactly as you've described. Now Rufus has achieved support for secure boot as now NTFS:UEFI Driver is signed for secure boot by Microsoft. Have a question about this project? In this case, try renaming the efi folder as efixxx, and then see if you get a legacy boot option. Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20200526.n.0 - 1.95 GB, guix-system-install-1.1.0.x86_64-linux.iso - 550 MB, ipfire-2.25.x86_64-full-core143.iso - 280 MB, SpringdaleLinux-8.1-x86_64-netinst.iso - 580 MB, Acronis.True.Image.2020.v24.6.1.25700.Boot.CD.iso - 690 MB, O-O.BlueCon.Admin.17.0.7024.WinPE.iso - 480 MB, adelie-live-x86_64-1.0-rc1-20200202.iso - 140 MB, fhclive-USB-2019.02_kernel-4.4.178_amd64.iso - 450 MB, MiniTool.Partition.Wizard.Technician.WinPE.11.5.iso - 390 MB, AOMEI.Backupper.Technician.Plus.5.6.0_UEFI.iso - 380 MB, O-O.DiskImage.Professional.14.0.321.WinPE.iso - 380 MB, EaseUS.Data.Recovery.Wizard.WinPE.13.2.iso - 390 MB, Active.Boot.Disk.15.0.6.x64.WinPE.iso - 400 MB, Active.Data.Studio.15.0.0.Boot.Disk.x64.iso - 550 MB, EASEUS.Partition.Master.13.5.Technician.Edition.WinPE.x64.iso - 500 MB, Macrium_Reflect_Workstation_PE_v7.2.4797.iso - 280 MB, Paragon.Hard.Disk.Manager.Advanced.17.13.1.x64.WinPE.iso - 400 MB, Passware.Kit.Forensic.2017.1.1.Win.10-64bit.BootCD.iso - 350 MB, orel-2.12.22-26.12.2019_13.14.livecd.iso - 1.1 GB, rocksolid-signage-release-installer-1.13.4-1.iso - 1.3 GB, manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso - 3 GB, OpenStage-2020.03-xfce4-x86_64.iso - 1.70 GB, resilientlinux-installer-amd64-2.2.iso - 2.20 GB, virage-beowulf-3.0-x86-64-UEFI-20191110_1146.iso - 1.30 GB, BlackWeb-Unleashed.19.11-amd64.hybrid.iso - 3 GB, yunohost-stretch-3.6.4.6-amd64-stable.iso - 400 MB, OpenMandrivaLx.4.2-snapshot-plasma.x86_64.iso - 2.10 GB Now, if Microsoft finally relinquished their abusive policy about not accepting GPLv3 code for Secure Boot signing and Ventoy was updated not to allow unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled (i.e. And for good measure, clone that encrypted disk again. see http://tinycorelinux.net/13.x/x86_64/release/ Then user will be clearly told that, in this case only distros whose bootloader signed with valid key can be loaded. https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/cooker/products/4/product_build_lists/3250 Discovery and usage of shim protocol of loaded shim binary for global UEFI validation functions (validation policy override with shim verification), Shim protocol unregistration of loaded shim binary (to prevent confusion among shims of multiple vendors and registration of multiple protocols which are handled by different chainloaded shims). But Ventoy currently does. Currently there is only a Secure boot support option for check. and leave it up to the user. If someone has physical access to a system then Secure Boot is useless period. So even when someone physically unplugs my SSD and installs a malicious bootloader/OS to it, it won't be able to decrypt the main OS partition. So, Ventoy can also adopt that driver and support secure boot officially. But this time I get The firmware encountered an unexpected exception. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and DiskGenius There are many other applications that can create bootable disks but Ventoy comes with its sets of features. Time-saving software and hardware expertise that helps 200M users yearly. Maybe we should just ask the user 'This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it?' gsrd90 New Member. then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. I still don't know why it shouldn't work even if it's complex. always used Archive Manager to do this and have never had an issue. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! You can grab latest ISO files here : Ventoy is able to chain boot Windows 10 (build 2004) just fine on the same systems. I have installed Ventoy on my USB and I have added some ISO's files : ventoy_x64.efi/ventoy_util_x64.efi ) , they do need digital signatures.